June 18, 2009 at 11:54 am (Annoying things, Women) ()

Ok I know I said I was done with this blog but I have nowhere else to put this rant.

Every time I ever see a news story about or involving women, ever, that has a comments thread, inevitably women in the comments will argue about something. Even more inevitably (because I’ve seen this happen when no one was even arguing), some shitbag will post something like “lol no wonder men rule the world, women can’t even stop arguing with each OTHER.”

I’d LIKE to think the people saying this, men and women alike, are just trolls and realize how ridiculous that statement is. They probably are actually so stupid they don’t notice arguing unless women are doing it, though, so I’m here to help set them straight on this one.

Men argue too. About EVERYTHING. If you have ever frequented a forum that men frequent, you know it’s one argument after another. Your opinion on the World of Warcraft forums, no matter what it may be, makes you an idiot. Sports forum? If you like a team so and so doesn’t like, you’re an idiot. And probably a fag for good measure. Have the idiots who make these statements about women ever watched a news channel? Like half of it is dudes arguing on some sort of panel. Watch a session of congress on CNN sometime. Your mind might be BLOWN at how much dudes argue.

I guess this plays into the whole “lol women are catty and cut each other down” trope, but I’ll believe women are more predisposed to doing that than men when men stop calling each other fags for stuff like drinking smirnoff and enjoying vegetables. Let’s be real here.

I suppose the people saying this think women have the potential to act as one hive-minded force, like bees, and enslave men to be used only for their sperm in order to perpetuate the human race. I’m here to make y’all feel better about this. Women may be strange and foreign to you, like the world outside of your basements, but I assure you they all have different minds and opinions. Just like men, believe it or not! I don’t know how one can be so head-up-ass as to think men never argue but women constantly do, but since there are such total dumb fucks out there, it’s still not a drinking problem, it’s a drinking solution.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Hmm

June 10, 2009 at 10:40 pm (Random)

This blog has been pointless and not cohesive for pretty much forever. I’m going to start a new one that actually has a point but I don’t know when. It’s not like I’ve been posting here anyway, but I’m done with this one. Meh.

Permalink Leave a Comment

I’ve never read this book, but I can tell you aallll about it.

May 6, 2009 at 3:55 pm (Total Sarcasm) (, )

So, Kate Harding co-authored a book called “Lessons from the Fat-O-Sphere: Quit Dieting and Declare a Truce with Your Body.” It’s the subject of the top three posts on the blog so go there for more info and squeeing over its high spots on bookseller lists.

I didn’t want to clog up any of those celebratory threads by making fun of reviewers, though, so I’m doing it here.

I think the idea of people reviewing things they haven’t even read is totally hilarious and should be done everywhere. I think more people should flip through a couple of pages of a book and then go review it–or even better–just look at the title and assume its contents. In this case–said reviewers assume–from a few pages and the title, that “Lessons from the Fat-O-Sphere” is all about how we should all go bathe in pies to purposely get diabetes.

So, I’m going to go review “Lord of the Rings” and say, “is this book a joke? A book about rings? Rings are boring, stationary objects. This whole book is probably a scam contrived by DeBeers to get us to buy more blood diamonds. Do not read!”

And then I’m going to review “Walden Pond” and say “I picked up this book thinking it’d be about humor, but after reading a few pages I learned it really is about a guy who lived by a POND. So, apparently, living by a pond makes you an expert on ponds. Apparently the whole medical industry is wrong about how murky pond water is full of bacteria and parasites and is unhealthy to ingest. I could blog about organic chemistry but it doesn’t mean I actually KNOW anything about it. Living by a pond doesn’t make you an expert on ponds!”

Oh, and then I’ll review “The Seven Spirtual Laws of Success” and say, “look. I’m a law student, and I’m around a lot of lawyers. I can tell you right now not one of them would ever say there is any sort of ‘law of success.’ Don’t come crying to us when you try to sue in court to uphold this ‘law of success.’ Pffft.”

Then I’ll move onto other media. I’ll review a “Squirrel Nut Zippers” CD and say “who would want to hear a bunch of squirrels putting nuts into zippers? I sure wouldn’t. Is this a joke?”

I’ll review “Fried Green Tomatoes,” the movie, and say “I do not know how a cookbook got made into a movie, but how boring! Fried Green Tomatoes are gross, too. Why would anyone want to watch a movie about making a disgusting food? I’ve been around a lot of lawyers, and let me tell you, none of them would want to watch a movie about cooking.”

Sure, I won’t get many positive clicks for “was this review helpful to you?” But then again, being completely uninformed doesn’t stop anyone else from blasting their opinions everywhere like so much explosive diarrhea, so why should it stop me?

Permalink Leave a Comment

Unless Obama nominates a hetero white dude to SCOTUS, it’s tokenism!

May 2, 2009 at 1:06 pm (Annoying things, Politics) (, , , )

Although Shakesville was not the first place I’ve heard of this total bullshit which is being bandied about, I’m linking the blog post because it’s what made me want to write about this myself. The Shakesville blog talks about why we SHOULD be purposefully selecting for diversity, and I think anyone who cannot understand that is either willfully obtuse and suffers from head up ass syndrome.

Aside from that, people always speak of supreme court nominations in fantasy land abstractions as if judges can just all be lined up around the circumference of the moon from worst to best, and whoever ends up in the front of the line should be chosen regardless of political affiliation.

Then, if you ask a person who says “the BEST QUALIFIED person should be chosen” what factors can go into that, choosing a justice for being a woman or a minority is so very very awful, choosing for political reasons is so very very awful. There must be objective criteria! To choose the BEST! Frankly, someone who thinks there has EVER in the history of this nation been a person nominated to the supreme court for some ethereal objective reasons having to do with some kind of superlative, awesome genius is so ignorant and dense he or she should just stop talking about it.

The worst part of this is any extremely qualified person who is nominated and happens to not be a white dude will be seen as having attained that position for “political reasons,” for “political correctness” (GASP!) rather than merit.

I’m saying this is fucking laughable because every fucking white dude on the court is there for fucking political reasons as well!

If anything, the most qualified person, if that distinction could hypothetically even be made, has obviously not always been chosen in the past or there would BE more diversity on the court. I cannot and do not believe the vast majority of intelligent, U.S. Supreme Court worthy justices have all been religious, heterosexual white dudes.

This kind of bullshit permeates society in so many ways, though. A female or black superhero is tokenism. If there’s a movie about a woman or a black person in a role generally only given to white dudes (action star, for example), it’s tokenism! To make a point! Oh yeah, Obama is tokenism too, or so the semi-illiterate rubes who make “voting for someone because he’s black is racism!” flair on facebook would have you believe. I’ve overheard one pocket of the white dudebro society of my school openly talk about how without “diversity” the quality of the students goes up. That’s the bottom fucking line, these people think all things considered, white guys ARE the upper echelon and allowing anyone else into the club is throwing a bone. A pity party!

I actually, you know, being a law student, read the opinions of various federal court members, and there are many male and female who are just as qualified as the other to become a Supreme Court member. There’s no magical person out there who shits golden opinions and is far and away so very obviously the best possible person for the job.

The opinion of disgusting, vomit-inducing Republican pundits, therefore, no matter what will be that any supreme court nominee who isn’t a white dude will not have gotten that position on the merits. No matter the brilliance, worthiness, or position in the circumference of the moon, that justice will be seen as an unworthy token.

Of course, “white guys won’t even be considered” is just a convenient excuse for believing there is no way said minority/woman could be on the court legitimately over white dudes, who are obviously superior and would always be in the front of that line, right?

Now if you’ll excuse me, I’ll be eagerly waiting for the sun to go down so I can switch to hard licker and giggle at Maru the cat rather than thinking about the people I’d like to relocate to Mars.

Permalink Leave a Comment

I’ve mentioned wanting to move to a different planet before, right?

April 22, 2009 at 8:43 am (Food) (, )

I was reading this blog post regarding experiments in calorie reduction, as linked from this blog post about forcing Guantanamo detainess to diet as torture (I’d really recommend reading both of those posts), and it’s similar to studies I’ve read about before regarding weight loss and why it’s regained and no one can stick to a diet, but I thought the parts about how it affects people mentally were particularly interesting and enlightening.

The thought of dieting circles my head occasionally because there is no real estate on Mars for me to set up my hermit shanty yet and I see diet commercials every five seconds when I watch TV. I assuage this desire by reminding myself that hey, I’m getting degrees right now, I need my mind to be sharp so I can study and learn! I guess I never really had a scientific reason this other than when I’m hungry I’m thinking about foods rather than what hearsay exception is implicated when someone shouts “Sweet Baby Jesus on a cracker he shot me!” seconds before death, but I guess when I’m right, I’m right.

I was thinking the other day about how baffling it is that the same person who spews the “calories in calories out” mantra to justify railing against people for being overweight has no problem believing there are people who can eat as much as they want and never get fat. Hey, they have high metabolisms! But when I tell people my husband and I eat the same shit every day and he weighs 100 pounds more than me, I am assured he must be eating something else SOMEWHERE you know. At work or something. Because if we ate the same shit we’d definitely have the same body types.

I’ve come to the conclusion that people abandon all logic in order to cling to their prejudices a long time ago, but it just wears me down so much. I try to tell as many people as I can I probably eat like 2500 calories a day or more, which would be “overeating” except that eating like a normal person is only overeating when you’re fat.

The fact that I should supposedly be able to happily live on roughly half the calories I do is where the diet thoughts come in. Geez I bet if I went on a diet I’d be like, Kiera Knightley, except that’s just a product of memory loss since I’ve dieted while running a few miles a week and doing yoga and I only lost ten pounds and was constantly sick and felt like shit on a stick.

So, I was also reading this blog post the other day, on Pandagon, which is a blog I really like and read all the time. I don’t really care to comment on the contents of the article so much, but I find it interesting that people didn’t consider comments about “idiots” purchasing diet cokes with fatty food to be fat shaming. Who are those idiots likely to be? I guarantee if I walked into a McDonalds and ordered 5 cheeseburgers and a large fry and a diet coke people wouldn’t think anything of it, but WOULD if a fat person walked in. If I did that it would probably accurately reflect what I was doing–having a once in a while treat, and having my brain replaced by someone who can tolerate artificial sweeteners and McDonalds food. But if a fat person does it, it’s probably a habit, right?

What struck me the most though was the author of the piece, Amanda Marcotte (and again, I really like her stuff a lot this is just thinking about what she said not trying to slam her or something) responding to a comment someone made about high metabolism people being able to eat what they want (which I can’t find again, I have to get ready to leave in a minute so I’m not reading them again), and saying well she wishes she had that metabolism, but since she doesn’t, she has to watch it.

I generally consider myself to have a good metabolism and I usually think it’d be unfair of me to sit there and chomp down a hamburger and think, well, tough luck person with a propensity for weight gain, you better have a heap o’ carrots. Mmmm burger omnomnom. Really though that’s probably an exaggeration of her point but that IS how a lot of people think about it. Oh I can go into McDonalds and have 12 chicken nuggets and a bucket of fries once in a while, but if I ever see someone fat in there, holy hell that person is shameful. I can engage in this activity, but when that person does it, it’s wrong. I can sit in my ivory tower and shake my head and make disapproving ingressive sounds with my tongue when I see someone else doing the exact same thing I’m doing because wow if *I* didn’t have a good metabolism I’d have the willpower to not see food as something I should enjoy, right?

On one hand it seems prudent to say “but of course, eating healthy is always good.” Well, yeah, eat your veggies. Blah blah blah. I also refuse to believe that eating Thanksgiving dinner and the occasional giant fucking chili cheese fry will shave ten years off of one’s life. I do think it would be great for the U.S. and the world if people of all incomes had access to healthy, hearty home-cooked food and weren’t wage slaves without the time to prepare it. I don’t think you can separate cultural reality of no money and time for organic greens with a grilled rosemary salmon every night from this food morality so it’s a moot point to pontificate on what people OUGHT to be eating when the ability to eat the oughtfoods is just not there. I also refuse to believe it’s any of my goddamned business what someone else chooses to ingest, all things being equal.

Don’t believe for a goddamn second all the studies which comprise our knowledge of what is good now will not be seen as outdated, strange and quaint as the practice of using leeches in medicine appears to us today. I guarantee people thought they were the height of modernity back then and looked upon the past as a swirling cauldron of ignorance and idiocy.

I guess this rant is all over the place and incoherent, but, tl;dr version, I’m fucking sick and tired of people holding others to standards they could never ever ever fucking ever adhere to themselves. I’m also sick of people not engaging their neurons and firing one fucking synapse when thinking about this shit. The end.

Permalink 1 Comment

Oh goddammit I need to put a different channel on in the morning

April 20, 2009 at 10:20 pm (Politics, Total Sarcasm) (, , )

The Today Show isn’t even *trying* to appear to be non-partisan anymore–they just had Newt Gingrich on this morning to talk about how much Obama sucks in his opinion, and that was the whole damn piece. No figure head for the other side, nothing. I guess they’ve done this with Laura “who the fuck?” Ingrahrharhm before, I just wasn’t compelled to write about it.

Not that I feel the “hey we need to represent both SIDES!” thing actually acheives some sort of non-bias or is anything but gimmicky bullshit, but since when is the Today show anything but gimmicky bullshit? I guess what chapped my hide was that they didn’t even challenge the ridiculous shit he was saying–he was like, “dude North Korea shot a MISSLE and Obama did NOTHING! Iran is building a bomb and we’re sitting on our Laurels! We’re all doomsauced! Oh we have to be coldly indifferent to people in other countries we don’t like we totally can’t be nice to them.”

Ok I kinda get the reasoning for the latter part of that, but why the fuck didn’t Meredith Lauer (I can’t damn well remember who did the interview) ask, “well, what would YOU have done about North Korea and Iran?” ‘Cause to me it sounded like he was gung ho about getting us embroiled in a whole new mess o’ never-ending wars.

Shit I guess it’s about time we expanded this paltry empire. Gingrich for President, 2012! We’ll either be able to fly to get some seriously authentic khoresht without passports, or we will be fighting for roadkill in the streets. Exciting, either way, right??

Permalink Leave a Comment

Sometimes maybe it’s better to never say anything ever?

April 17, 2009 at 12:48 pm (Annoying things, Food) (, )

I have a problem, that when I become depressed, I completely lose my appetite and don’t want to eat.

Yes, that’s a problem.

Nothing bugs me more than people looking forward to being sick or depressed so they will lose weight. “Someone I love died, but I lost ten pounds so I feel great!” sounds so vile and insipid to me my brain cannot even comprehend someone not taking that as a sarcastic comment, and a poor one at that.

I’m the kind of person with diarrhea of the mouth (and I’ve been sick the past few days with a sore throat, when I told my husband that’s my least favorite way to be sick, he said “because you can’t talk as much anymore?” I didn’t know whether to be insulted by that), and generally when I have a problem or feel a certain way I’m liable to tell people about it. Hence, “man I haven’t felt like eating in forever.”

This often, though, elicits these sorts of reactions:

From my husband: “you’d better eat before your blood sugar crashes and you bite my head off”

Some people: “wow I wish that’s what happened to me when I got depressed, I usually eat more!”

Some people think I’m bragging or something and get annoyed?

I don’t know. I just wish I could say that as “hey man this sucks, I don’t want to feel opposed to providing my body with the fuel it needs to operate” without eliciting negative responses. I don’t want it to have all these touchy connotations that “oh I have the flu and I’ve been shitting up a storm” does not have.

I’m not saying people are stupid for having those responses because I think we’re culturally conditioned to feel that way, but I wish the very act of eating or not eating didn’t have so much baggage attached to it. It’s annoying, but understandable. I wish it was treated like other necessary human bodily functions–similarly to if I said “wow I haven’t been able to sleep for days” or “I haven’t been able to breathe for days,” (although I suspect the latter would mean I was a zombie if I were writing about it) and I wouldn’t be seen as having an ulterior motive aside from good old fashioned pissing and moaning for having said it.

About to go force myself to eat lunch, because I’ve come to terms with the fact that food is necessary for my continued survival, news at 11.

Permalink 1 Comment

In which I have crappy daydreams

April 15, 2009 at 8:07 am (Random) (, )

Every once in a while I have a daydream about, I don’t know, actually intervening when someone is being attacked on a bus or something–and the purpose of it isn’t to be like “hey neat I’d be a hero,” but to ponder who would be put on the Today show to talk about it since I sure as hell will never allow my mug to ever be on TV. I mean you can totally tell that’s what they do–when someone is unavailable or doesn’t want to be on TV, they seek out a friend or relative to talk about it. I always wonder if said friend or relative is even that close to the person in question.

It’s really funny though when that person wasn’t there, really had nothing to do about it, and is on the Today show by virtue of having the slightest tangential knowledge of the person they actually WANTED to interview. It’s like “oh! What an amazing story! This person used Karate skills to save a bus of school children from a crazed gunman! Get that fucker on! Wait, she isn’t interested in being subjected to our insipid questions at 5 am? Well, shit. Wait, her father’s brother’s nephew’s cousin’s former roommate wants to talk? Just as good!”

Meredith Viera: “Hello, hero’s cousin! How are you today!”

Cousin: <Stares blankly for a good 10 seconds> “Good! Good.”

Meredith Viera: “Isn’t what happened yesterday totally amazing?”

Cousin: “Oh yeah, totally amazing.”

Meredith Viera: “So how long have you known your cousin?”

Cousin: “I guess since birth if you consider being related to someone knowing them!”

Meredith: “Did you think she was capable of such a selfless act and karate skills?”

Cousin: “Yeah, even as a toddler she would apologize after kicking me in the shins and making me buckle over in pain.”

Meredith: “Thank you for talking to us today!”

<Camera pans away>

<Everyone sits around and says the word amazing a dozen times>

I think I talk about the Today Show enough now to make it a tag. That’s kinda sad.

Permalink 1 Comment

You must read this

April 8, 2009 at 9:55 pm (Awesome Things, Politics) (, )

Roger Ebert vs. Bill O’Reilly

It’s seriously one great smack after another. I was dying laughing. I am going to remember the last “story” in this and use it every day. EVERY DAY I TELL YOU.

I think I’m going to make facebook friends or twitter friends with Roger Ebert, if I can! Haha!

Edit: I can’t. Apparently he’s too cool for social networking sites.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Eat a cat hair-covered chocolate ass, ESPN

April 6, 2009 at 9:39 pm (Annoying things, Sports, WTF?) (, , , )

Oh man, I’ve been watching baseball today, and since teams are playing within their own divisions you’d think the ESPN announcers would be semi bearable. Usually in games where any team not from the east coast is pitted against an east coast team, the announcers sit there drooling over the east coast team players as if they were cheesecake. The whole game you just see shots of Yankee/Red Sox players picking their noses and grabbing their crotches while the announcers verbally masturbate them. Really. It sucks. Tonight though, opening night, they couldn’t possibly do that. No, teams are playing their own divisions!

Well I was wrong. Even when two west coast teams are playing, ESPN announcers still manage to annoy the coffee-loosened shit out of me.

Tonight, during the Angels A’s game, the announcers took a large chunk of time to pan to images of people in the crowd eating food, admonishing them for how “bad” the food they were eating was, blah blah fucking blah who the fuck is going to eat celery and carrots at a fucking baseball game. I guess the little boy got away with eating a churro because he “has his whole life to work it out,” but one woman bringing a bunch of nachos to her seat better have been sharing them with others! Or I guess she will be DOOMED! I hope that woman ate all of those hamsterfucking nachos. Every single fucking one of them.

Good god the last thing I want to hear while watching a baseball game is a food lecture! I have all of the fucking commercials to do that for me, since 90% of all commercials I ever see are for some form of diet bullshit.

GRRRAH!

Permalink 1 Comment

Next page »